In this series, Kobe Bryant is a combined 1-6 FG (four total points) in 54 possessions when guarded by Tony Allen or Rajon Rondo. Bryant had 42 touches in those 54 possessions. In 16 possessions when defended by Rondo in this series, Bryant has 14 touches but has not attempted a shot and scored zero points.
http://espn.go.com/nba/dailydime/_/page/dime-100608/daily-dime
I just don't believe that. What's their definition of "guarded by"? When Ray is out of the game and Tony is in it, he's covering Kobe, right? In Game 1, Kobe scored plenty with TA in there.
I dont think they're defining it that way. I'd imagine most transition buckets aren't being counted, and Kobe wasn't "guarded" by anyone. When they're saying "guarded by", I don't think he's just referring to defense assignments, but actual touches by Kobe with a man on him.
Could very well be a flawed stat on how they define his touches too. Are those touches within scoring range? What if he brings up the ball, those shouldn't count.
I just watched highlights of Game 1 (ugh). In one, Tony was out of position, and Kobe ended up going 1-on-1 with Perk and ended up scoring. Does that mean he was "guarded by" Perk, because Tony got lost?
That seems like a ridiculous way of looking at things. Even from watching the highlights, I saw three Kobe baskets when he was guarded by Tony in Game 1, so I'm just at a loss regarding what this stat is documenting.
Let me make it easy for you, Roy. If Kobe is in transition, leaking out for wide open dunks, then nobody is guarding him (as happened twice in Game 1). If Kobe is stealing inbound passes and hitting threes or getting to the line, then nobody is guarding him (as happened twice in Game 2). If Kobe is being guarded by TA, and Bynum picks him, and Perk is forced to switch onto Kobe, then Perk is guarding Kobe for purposes of this stat. And if Mike Finley is standing straight up at the 3 point line and Farmar or Brown drive right by him for a layup or dunk, then Finley was (or at least trying to) guard them. It's really not that hard.
As for the veracity of this stat, it stands up if you understand how it's measured. Kobe was 6 of 7 against Ray Allen in Game 1, and 4 of 15 against everyone else (including one that he got on TA). In Game 2, Kobe didn't score on TA at all, and Kobe was either traveling, being forced into offensive fouls, or missing buckets against TA.
As for what this means so far--probably nothing. Kobe's found a nice rhythm against Ray (in Game 1), but Paul, TA, and Kobe have done a nice job getting in his face, getting into his body, and making him uncomfortable. It's hard to expect that to continue to happen, since Kobe has been missing shots too. But I think the first two games show that TA, Rondo, and Paul are all better options to guard Kobe one-on-one, though Ray Allen did a much better job guarding Kobe in Game 2.
What I'd hope the Cs take a look at is not doubling so quickly when Rondo gets caught on Kobe in a cross-switch. Too often in Game 2, Rondo would get caught in a cross-switch, Kobe would take him into the post, somebody would double on Kobe, and Kobe would find Gasol, who would either convert himself or find Bynum for a dunk. Those baskets were created by the double team and I'd like to see us force Kobe to score against Rondo in that situation as opposed to giving the Lakers an avenue to the interior of our defense, feeding right into their #1 advantage against us.