I mean this in the best way, but the Cs dropping a few games here and there really reminds me of how the Spurs tend to rein it in a bit just before putting on a serious push. I do think the Celtics need home court advantage more than the Spurs ever do, partially because the Celtics are a more emotional team and because Cleveland has a legitimately great home court advantage. But I think they can get away without it. Here's why.
My hope is that the Cavs drop a few to match the Celtics. I expect Marbury and Moore will contribute but need a few weeks to do so, hopefully coming soon after the return of a healthy, energized and motivated KG. If KG brings his offense, and if Marbury can add 5-10 PPG (which I don't think is asking too much) then hopefully that takes a load off of Pierce and Allen, who can store something up for the playoffs.
So if we can depend on a #2 seed, then there are two real problems. Going through Orlando (likely) instead of the #4 or #5 seed, and playing in Cleveland. I don't think Orlando poses a problem; the Cs can hopefully wrap that series up in 5-6. Assuming the Cavs cruise behind Lebron and win both first round series in 4-6 games, that would leave both teams equally tired, the advantage going to Cleveland because I don't think I've ever seen Lebron James get tired.
Naturally you'd think with how close the series was last year, Cleveland's improvement and the Celtics lacking Posey or PJ, that swings it in the Cavs favor. But one thing we will very likely have that we completely lacked last year is Ray Allen. As most will recall, he was pretty bad the first few series. I don't expect a duplication this year. He is healthier, you can tell just by watching him. And while we'll lack PJ and Posey, we also have an ever evolving Rajon Rondo. Mo Williams is over rated, and I think the Celtics back court can, if needed, grab them an away-win in the ECF.
Anyone else seeing it this way? Think I'm way off?