i honestly am not sure who will be traded but I strongly feel like;
Smart
Walker
Brown
Tatum
Are completely untouchable due to chemistry. I strongly WANT to throw Hayward on this list, but he’s been out the lineup so much it’s just hard for me to ignore that we win a lot of games without him.
Not true.
Celts only lost 1 game when Hayward was healthy.
When Hayward was out, Celts lost 4 games.
He's also the ceiling raising piece we need to raise our offence to true contender status imo. Our team will be fine without a ceiling raiser like Hayward because of our solid top 5, but he's our final piece to the puzzle if we want to start rolling teams over with our offence to be a real threat to win the title (I don't think our defence is elite enough to win playoff games all by itself, we need a really good offence that can roll over any team when we're clicking).
I think the Celts can be a great regular season team with Tatum, Kemba, Hayward, Brown, and Smart.
But in the playoffs, if the Celts put that 5 on the court, the opposing team will be able to exploit the Celts' lack of size.
It's all about adjustments in the playoffs.
We might shock a team like the Sixers in Game 1, but in Game 2, the opposing coach will make adjustments to counter what the Celts did in Game 1.
A more balanced Celtics team will get to the Finals.
If it's always small ball every time, opposing teams will figure it out sooner or later.
We don't have to play small all the time though. Kanter is playable against Philly and Theis is a proper centre against a more modern team like Milwaukee (yes they're big, but they're not big enough to throw Theis around like a rag doll).
Yes, but if Kanter or Theis is playing, it's going to be Smart sitting.
What good will it do if Smart is sitting on the bench and not playing.
In the last 5 minutes of the game, if you have Kanter or Theis with Kemba, Tatum, Hayward, and Brown, that means Smart is sitting.
As an option to play big? Having Smart on the bench as an option in crunch time is better than trading Smart for a big man who's only marginally better than our current options. It's KAT or bust, going for a marginal upgrade at the cost of our core 5/picks and prospects is just madness.
How is Drummond a marginal upgrade over Theis and Kanter?
Drummond is a 2-time All-Star, an All-NBA 3rd teamer in 2016, and led the league in rebounding in 2016, 2018, and 2019.
Right now Drummond is once again leading the NBA in rebounds with 17.0 rebounds per game.
There's just no way Drummond is just a marginal upgrade over Theis and Kanter.
He's a marginal upgrade for what we need out of our centres at the moment. We need a centre who can protect the rim while being able to defend in space and have decent passing to keep our offence humming if his offence isn't top tier to make us build the offence around him. Drummond is a solid rim protector and isn't horrible defending in space, but Theis has been defending in a whole stratosphere above him so far this season. As for passing, Drummond isn't too shabby but he's not really much (if any) better than Theis.
Did you see the game against the Nets in Brooklyn?
Brad had to pull Theis out of the game because Jarrett Allen and DeAndre Jordan were abusing Theis.
It wasn't Theis' fault, Theis was just too small for both Jordan and Allen.
What you're not seeing is Drummond is big, like a smaller version of Shaq.
Guys like Embiid, Jordan, and Allen will not be able to do what they are doing to Theis.
Theis is excellent when the opposing team doesn't have a quality big man.
But when it's guys like Brook Lopez or Myles Turner, Theis will struggle.
We have to accept the fact that Theis is only 6-8.
I only saw our perimeter guys stink it up that cost us the game. Sure Theis isn't a good matchup for those high energy bigs, but let's not act like the teams that have those sort of bigs can beat us in a game of 5 on 5 basketball in a 7 game series. Also we have Kanter for the leviathans of the league, and the good teams with those sorts of big men (eg. Philly) can't really punish him enough to make him unplayable.
If your argument is that the Celtics don’t need a Center upgrade then you are really crazy. Jarrett Allen absolutely destroyed us!!!! Jokic also made us look like little kids. Yes the small ball has worked FOR NOW but there is absolutely no way we can win in the playoffs not getting boards and getting beat up down low lol.
I didn't say that we don't need a centre upgrade, I was arguing that very little upgrades would make sense for us. And we haven't been playing very small so far, we've been playing a true big in most of our lineups quite a lot.
Reason for that is Brown and Hayward have only played together in 4 games, 5 games if you count when Hayward got hurt against the Spurs.
What happens when everybody is healthy?
I'm sure CBS will have no choice but to use Smart as the Center in the last 5 minutes of the game.
It's actually a pretty good option to have, Smart can really frustrate certain types of bigs. Having more options never hurts, trading a good option in general for one that's only better in very specific circumstances and is mostly worse is (eg. Smart/Hayward for Drummond).
I don't think Drummond is one-dimensional.
What you're implying is Drummond is more like Ben Wallace, only good on defense.
Drummond can score 20 points per game.
If the Celts have Drummond surrounded by the likes of Tatum, Kemba, and Brown, Drummond will score a lot because opposing teams will not be able to cover all the Celtic scorers.
It will be the Celtics punishing the smaller teams with Drummond scoring inside the paint.
Drummond is a 2-way player on a bad team.
Put Drummond on an elite team and Drummond will flourish.