on Espn's front page: The Lakers did what few believed possible Thursday: They beat the Celtics, in Boston, without Andrew Bynum. It took overtime, but Kobe & Co. outlasted the defending champions 110-109
Few believed this was possible? is that why everyone picked the Lakers-without Bynum- last year in the finals???
Does Bynum really change everything about the lakers so much?
Obviously ESPN wanted to point out how good the Lakers are... OMG, I wanna throw up... It's so bad to know that behind this Lakers team there is a league and a whole media-world supporting them...where's the justice my Lord??
Take solace in the fact that they had the league and media behind them in the finals too. And look how that turned out
Yes, and the Lakers lost at home to Charlotte. Let's give them a cookie for beating the Celtics in a regular season game. I hate the media. If the Lakers had lost they would still find away to put a good spin on it. The problem with this win though is there was no KG in the deciding moments. Did not read the article but I am guessing nothing about what a cheap call that was to get KG out of the game. I can't stand reading those article win or lose when C's play the Lakers because of the bias. If that had somehow happened to Kobe they would be talking about it incessantly. But apparently that does not matter. Hate ESPN they don't even try to hide their bias. ESPN all thought Lakers were going to win in the finals and when they lost they backpedaled by using Bynum as an excuse. It's sickening.
Sorry, end of rant but it gets on my nerves.