I like the Powe comparison, minus a little bit of athleticism and plus a little bit of range.
Although the energy level is similar, I think the advanced skill-level of Hansborough, as well as lack of athleticism compared to Powe really don't make them a great comparison.
Powe averaged 20 and 10 his final year. Hansborough averaged 20 and 10 last year and currently is at 22 and 7 which he will likely end up right about last years pace. How is it that Tyler has an advanced skill level?! I live here in the UNC/Duke hotspot and see a LOT of him. He may have a little better shooting range, but is not really a shooter either. I don't think he is any more skilled than Powe, however I agree that Powe has better athleticism. He has a very quick footwork where Hansborough is quite slow footed. I love his heart though and would love him on my team! He finds a way in spite of his deficiencies just like Powe.
Tyler is putting those numbers in 8 minutes less per game this season.
Yes, however in those 8 less minutes he is taking about as many shots and free throws as Powe was during his time. UNC is also a lot better team with a much better PG in Lawson to get him the ball in better places. I think the point though was that Powe's skill level IMO is as high as Hansborough's.
He is a better shooter, ballhandler, and passer, and also has much more advanced footwork (perhaps Hansborough is slower, but his footwork is tremendous, while Powe's was, and still is a work in progress)than Powe was at this point in his career.
In college, Powe was a hell of a player, but he was purely a power player, who used his strength, quickness and athleticism to get where he wanted. Hansbrough doesn't have that kind of strength and athletism, and instead has to use his other skills.
Productionwise, I agree that they are good comparisons, I just think their actual skillsets are not that similar.