@jpotter33
>highly questionable rotation decisions>
>holding players more accountable>
this is vague. basically just saying Stevens could do better.
IMO if you could give concrete examples, it would help the conversation go forward.
I give examples all the time.
There are three prominent ones that I harp on all of the time. First is this insistence to continue starting Al and Amir, which has clearly not worked since neither of them are capable of defending out on the perimeter. And it wasn't just due to KO's injury like Salt theorized earlier in another thread. He's said that JJ will still only be starting against certain teams, which just doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
Second is this insistence of still going to the three guard (point guards, nonetheless) lineups, even when they've been a disaster by almost every measure. Statistically and by the eye test, those lineups are beyond terrible, but Brad just continues to go to them for trust reasons or something like that.
Third is his inconsistent usage of staggering IT and Horford, especially when we have injuries, specifically when Smart has to play mainly with the first unit. This is something that he should ALWAYS do, because it helps to always have a primary focus of offense for the defense to focus on. Yet, he's been very inconsistent in this regard, and a lot of times it's caused big runs with the bench giving up leads sans IT and AL.
He has improved on some rotation decisions, though, such as having Smart be the primary ballhandler behind IT. At the start of the year, he had Rozier doing a lot of the ballhandling, but he recognized that it wasn't working. He also has started having IT off the ball more, which is also something that works really well in small doses.
And I applaud him for those moves. He is a good coach, but he's far from perfect and far from being above criticism. And this whole notion that you can't criticize him without thinking you're a "better coach" or something is just nonsense. People here need to lighten up. Nobody is above criticism.