CelticsStrong

Beyond the Association => College Basketball => Topic started by: Bahku on July 15, 2010, 05:16:59 AM

Title: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Bahku on July 15, 2010, 05:16:59 AM

This thread is dedicated to general discussion of 2010-2011 NCAA Regular-Season College Basketball.


(http://www.sportsbookgurus.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ncaa-basketball-logo.jpg)



(http://nbcsportsmedia.msnbc.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/090117-duke-hmed-1p.hmedium.jpg)


Should be a great season!

Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on November 09, 2010, 02:03:46 AM
Watched my URI Rams in their season opener and the season opener to the season tonight (will be watching a replay of tonight's C's game tomorrow) saw the same thing from the past 4-5 years.

No transition defense and defense all together basically.  Awful rebounding, got outrebounded by about 13 and we were not able to take care of the ball at all! 

Still we had Pitt on the rope for most of the game until the middle of the second half and there is a long long time left in the season to improve on these weaknesses.

I am just dissapointed that year after year these weakenesses stay with the team and our offensive game is why we always come close to making it to the NCAA tournament, but are a NIT team.  Maybe the players will step up and have a new effort on defense.  Or maybe if that doesn't happen and it is just another year of almost making it, but not quite it is time for a change in the coaching department.  I'm hoping it is the former and not the latter.

At least my favorite NBA team knows how to defend  ;D.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Bahku on December 04, 2010, 01:50:52 PM
Great game between Kentucky and UNC on right now ... the Tar Heels more formidable than Kentucky expected, I think.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: fairweatherfan on December 04, 2010, 03:26:23 PM
Nice win by Carolina!  Good to see them playing up to potential for once.

Now I just need Cuse to take out NC State and the day will be complete.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Bahku on December 04, 2010, 06:13:40 PM
Nice win by Carolina!  Good to see them playing up to potential for once.

Now I just need Cuse to take out NC State and the day will be complete.

What is it with them and big white guys named Tyler?  It's like it was some kind of weird mojo thing they were worried about: "OK, now Hansbrough's gone, we've gotta go out and find a clone!" ;)
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Kuberski33 on December 04, 2010, 09:15:25 PM
U.Mass - BC was nice game.  Love watching U. Mass dribble drive motions offense...and they press man to man full court.  Kellogg just needs a little more talent.  Jackson is a big time player for BC.  Horrible turnout by BC fans though....biggest bunch of front running fans this side of New York.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: ToppersBsktball10 on December 05, 2010, 01:18:22 AM
U.Mass - BC was nice game.  Love watching U. Mass dribble drive motions offense...and they press man to man full court.  Kellogg just needs a little more talent.  Jackson is a big time player for BC.  Horrible turnout by BC fans though....biggest bunch of front running fans this side of New York.

Wait 'til Jordan Laguerre goes to UMASS next year, he'll fit perfect in their offense. Smooth lefty combo guard who's explosive and can shoot the lights out and create his own shot. He's a stud, if he was 6' 5" he'd be a legit NBA prospect. He's out of Manchester, NH and goes to New Hampton Prep, previously going to Trinity High in Manchester. His junior year he was the best player in nh public highschool. In the state championship his junior year(two years ago) he scored 26 points...the other team only scored 25 points. I played in the same AAU tournament as he did this spring, didn't play him because he was on a u17 team and mine was u15.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: ToppersBsktball10 on December 06, 2010, 01:55:32 PM
here's a little more on Laguerre http://www.newenglandrecruitingreport.com/news/article/1505/UMass-Lands-Laguerre.php
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: fairweatherfan on December 07, 2010, 10:22:52 AM
Nice win by Carolina!  Good to see them playing up to potential for once.

Now I just need Cuse to take out NC State and the day will be complete.

What is it with them and big white guys named Tyler?  It's like it was some kind of weird mojo thing they were worried about: "OK, now Hansbrough's gone, we've gotta go out and find a clone!" ;)

Zeller was actually there for Hansborough's last year, though he was hurt for a lot of it with a broken wrist.

So it's more of an apprenticeship than a replacement system  :)
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on December 26, 2010, 07:21:30 PM
Huge game for my Rhody Rams this Wednesday against no one other than BC.  We got you guys last year Rondo2287  ;D.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Rondo2287 on December 26, 2010, 07:24:19 PM
Huge game for my Rhody Rams this Wednesday against no one other than BC.  We got you guys last year Rondo2287  ;D.

Ya should be a good one.  BC is in a fun transition year right now.  Shoot alot of threes, we can beat anybody, but we can lose to anybody too.  Don't know to much about URI this year, but if Raji can rebound the basketball, and Trapani doesnt shoot to much it should be a good matchup
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on December 26, 2010, 07:28:35 PM
Huge game for my Rhody Rams this Wednesday against no one other than BC.  We got you guys last year Rondo2287  ;D.

Ya should be a good one.  BC is in a fun transition year right now.  Shoot alot of threes, we can beat anybody, but we can lose to anybody too.  Don't know to much about URI this year, but if Raji can rebound the basketball, and Trapani doesnt shoot to much it should be a good matchup

Yeah idk that much about BC's roster this year, especially with Sanders (from my home state) transfering. 

Rhody this year is in sort of a rebuilding year this season, but they still got time to grow and mature.   

I'll be at the game so I'm hoping the homecourt advantage can help and finally have a good crowd at the Ryan Center for once.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on January 08, 2011, 06:21:43 PM
Tons of conference upsets today.  Great way to start the conference season.

I think will see tons of the teams beating up on each other in the big conferences throughout the season.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: dpaps on January 12, 2011, 11:11:59 PM
DUKE GOES DOWN!!!!!!! yeah buddy
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: fairweatherfan on January 12, 2011, 11:15:37 PM
DUKE GOES DOWN!!!!!!! yeah buddy

TP, hadn't heard.  Duke got a great draw last year and they're not as good as their early play.  Glad to see them go down so early.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: GreenFaith1819 on January 27, 2011, 12:24:27 AM
Ok - this Jimmer Fredette kid. I was holding out judgement on him, but I think he is a NBA player, for real.

He was guarded really well on some of his shots, and still hit them.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Atzar on January 27, 2011, 12:33:11 AM
Ok - this Jimmer Fredette kid. I was holding out judgement on him, but I think he is a NBA player, for real.

He was guarded really well on some of his shots, and still hit them.

I agree.  Like I said in another thread, he converted me tonight.  I didn't think he could get his shot off against bigger, more athletic players, but he proved tonight that he can do that.  Very quick release.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: fairweatherfan on February 09, 2011, 04:18:19 PM
Best 2 rivalries in college ball (imo) in a doubleheader tonight: 

(http://www.ablueandgoldstateofmind.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/syracuse_logo1.jpg)

vs

(http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQyPOK798w2xZw90s2lb48Z1uNLKiOp15HJ4NbNUZrqR5Frkmef&t=1)

and

(http://media2.newsobserver.com/static/content/images/UNC_logo.jpg)

vs

(http://www.outsports.com/moresports/duke%20logo.jpg)

Go Cuse and Carolina!!  (just hoping for a split realistically).
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on February 09, 2011, 04:37:01 PM
Best 2 rivalries in college ball (imo) in a doubleheader tonight: 

(http://www.ablueandgoldstateofmind.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/syracuse_logo1.jpg)

vs

(http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQyPOK798w2xZw90s2lb48Z1uNLKiOp15HJ4NbNUZrqR5Frkmef&t=1)

and

(http://media2.newsobserver.com/static/content/images/UNC_logo.jpg)

vs

(http://www.outsports.com/moresports/duke%20logo.jpg)

Go Cuse and Carolina!!  (just hoping for a split realistically).

Should be a fun night.  Really looking forward to the Duke UNC game. 

Oh and Fairweather why Cuse and Carolina?  Jw.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: jgod213 on February 09, 2011, 04:43:49 PM
whats the deal with ESPN covering seemingly ALL of Purdue's games?  I typically watch a couple of CBB games a week, and 1 always ends up being a Purdue game.

that team is going to make some serious noice in the tourney between Johnson/Moore.  I also like Illinois a lot - they've been underachieving for a few years but they have the vets to really give someone hell next month.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on February 09, 2011, 05:01:51 PM
whats the deal with ESPN covering seemingly ALL of Purdue's games?  I typically watch a couple of CBB games a week, and 1 always ends up being a Purdue game.

that team is going to make some serious noice in the tourney between Johnson/Moore.  I also like Illinois a lot - they've been underachieving for a few years but they have the vets to really give someone hell next month.

It's too bad they don't have Robbie Hummell... Again.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: CorruptWave on February 09, 2011, 05:07:16 PM
I WANT HARRISON BARNES AND JARED SULLINGER. BOTH OF THEM.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: fairweatherfan on February 09, 2011, 05:33:55 PM
Should be a fun night.  Really looking forward to the Duke UNC game. 

Oh and Fairweather why Cuse and Carolina?  Jw.

I grew up in upstate NY and Syracuse is the closest thing to a major league team up there - I've been a Cuse fan since kindergarten or so. 

I used to hate Carolina but I went to grad school there so now they're my second-favorite - Chapel Hill is the only place I've ever gotten to celebrate a title in person too.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: CorruptWave on February 09, 2011, 05:35:15 PM
hey fairweatherfan

you root for the sixers? That sounds better than "fair weather" to me.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: fairweatherfan on February 09, 2011, 06:46:51 PM
hey fairweatherfan

you root for the sixers? That sounds better than "fair weather" to me.

No, not a Sixers fan (Iggy is one of my favorite non-Cs though).  I'm running the Sixers in the Pick 2 Draft thing that's been all over the Latest Topics for awhile. 

You a Cavs guy?  Rough year for the fellas.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: CorruptWave on February 09, 2011, 06:59:47 PM
Quote
You a Cavs guy?  Rough year for the fellas.
That's the understatement of the year, buddy boy. I've been watching basketball since I was in high school. Never have I seen such wretchedness, ineptitude, and submissive play.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Atzar on February 09, 2011, 10:38:13 PM
So, Steph Curry has a brother. 
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on February 12, 2011, 04:05:06 PM
Ohio State just lost.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on February 14, 2011, 11:48:27 PM
Just two days after Ohio States loses it's top spot in the poll another number one bites the dust...

This time Kansas pretty handedly too.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Bahku on February 19, 2011, 05:45:05 PM
Zeller reminds me of Hansbrough ... especially extra-effort-wise. BC making a run here at the end ... down to a five-point game.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Bahku on February 19, 2011, 05:53:06 PM
Down to two points with a minute left ... nice run by BC.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on February 19, 2011, 07:29:50 PM
Down to two points with a minute left ... nice run by BC.

What a strange game that UNC BC one was today.  Couldn't score a lick in the first half either team.  UNC takes control over the second half, but BC gets back in it in a blink of an eye with their three ball and loses on an rimmed out three by Reggie Jackson.

This doesn't have to do with the UNC BC game, but IMO I'm kind of dissapointed with college basketball this year.  It seems really really down.

Even though making the college game is not the responsibility of the NBA, but making the NBA better is, which I think this would do.  I hope that the NBA puts in a rule that either you enter the draft out of high school or if you go to college you have to stay after 3 years or until you are 21. 
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Bahku on February 19, 2011, 07:36:37 PM
Down to two points with a minute left ... nice run by BC.

What a strange game that UNC BC one was today.  Couldn't score a lick in the first half either team.  UNC takes control over the second half, but BC gets back in it in a blink of an eye with their three ball and loses on an rimmed out three by Reggie Jackson.

This doesn't have to do with the UNC BC game, but IMO I'm kind of dissapointed with college basketball this year.  It seems really really down.

Even though making the college game is not the responsibility of the NBA, but making the NBA better is, which I think this would too.  I hope that the NBA puts in a rule that either you enter the draft out of high school or if you go to college you have to stay after 3 years or until you are 21.  

Yeah, I completely agree ... some people think otherwise, but I believe the level of competition in the NCAA has dropped off with the direct-from-high school rulings, and I really hope it changes, and that it's done in a way that rewards players for staying in college. I know and understand the other side of the equation, and that some kids want to improve the lives of their families and themselves financially, but I really feel like staying in school is better in the long run, and that college ball has suffered of late.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Eja117 on February 24, 2011, 10:41:46 PM
PSU's Taylor Battle just became the first player in Big Ten history to go for 2000,500,500 in a career.

Other players to do it include but not limited to

Speedy Claxton
Danny Ainge
Jameer Nelson
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on February 24, 2011, 10:53:45 PM
PSU's Taylor Battle just became the first player in Big Ten history to go for 2000,500,500 in a career.

Other players to do it include but not limited to

Speedy Claxton
Danny Ainge
Jameer Nelson

Taylor Battle is nasty.  Saw him play against my Rhody Rams in the NIT a few years ago.  Kid's nasty.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on March 05, 2011, 12:36:28 PM
UNC Duke round 2 tonight!
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: fairweatherfan on March 11, 2011, 02:06:41 PM
Is it too soon to officially declare my basketball man-crush on Kendall Marshall?
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: GreenFaith1819 on March 12, 2011, 12:52:49 PM
This guy Jimmer......drops 52 on New Mexico yesterday...it will be interesting to see him adjust to the NBA, but this man's a player for sure.

And Kemba Walker??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvPuRMIU57s
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: fairweatherfan on March 12, 2011, 12:57:32 PM
Kemba Walker reminds me a lot of an OJ Mayo-type: he's talented enough to make good money and put up good numbers in the NBA, but I don't know if his game is conducive to helping a team win meaningful games.

And no, I'm not just saying that as a bitter Syracuse fan  ;)

EDIT: Oh yeah, but that move on McGee was genuinely sick.  An NBA defense switches back on that or brings the double, though.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: GreenFaith1819 on March 12, 2011, 01:01:01 PM
Kemba Walker reminds me a lot of an OJ Mayo-type: he's talented enough to make good money and put up good numbers in the NBA, but I don't know if his game is conducive to helping a team win meaningful games.

And no, I'm not just saying that as a bitter Syracuse fan  ;)

Good Point...good analysis of Kemba.

I bet 'Cuse still gets a decent seeding, though. Sunday's selection committee will be interesting.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: fairweatherfan on March 12, 2011, 01:03:16 PM
I bet 'Cuse still gets a decent seeding, though. Sunday's selection committee will be interesting.

Hoping for a 3 seed, but I think a 4 is more likely.

And I've still got my #2 team UNC to root for, so all's well.  My favorite time of basketball season, no offense to the NBA. 
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: GreenFaith1819 on March 12, 2011, 01:06:01 PM
I bet 'Cuse still gets a decent seeding, though. Sunday's selection committee will be interesting.

Hoping for a 3 seed, but I think a 4 is more likely.

And I've still got my #2 team UNC to root for, so all's well.  My favorite time of basketball season, no offense to the NBA. 

Yeah, that upset win over Duke was huge for UNC. Now that's a rivalry almost as deep as LA - Boston.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Cman on March 12, 2011, 09:00:30 PM
Washington upsets Arizona in OT on Isiaih (sp?) Thomas' game winner at the buzzer.  Beautiful shot and beautiful way to win for the little guy.  Pretty fun game, but Washington was frustrating to watch at times (dribbling out the clock, not making any FTs...).
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on March 13, 2011, 01:19:44 PM
What a Big East tournament and final last night. 

How I would love to see a Jimmer Fredette Kemba Walker matchup in the tournament!!
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Onslaught on March 13, 2011, 04:50:32 PM
Sorry Tarholes. The better team won today.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: CoachBo on March 13, 2011, 05:44:56 PM
Crazy year. The person who wins the bracket contest this year is going to be the one who picks the games based on uniform color, mascots, favorite states, etc.

If you try to reason these games out, you're going to be out of the contest by the end of the first weekend.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: fairweatherfan on March 13, 2011, 08:29:32 PM
I bet 'Cuse still gets a decent seeding, though. Sunday's selection committee will be interesting.

Hoping for a 3 seed, but I think a 4 is more likely.

And I've still got my #2 team UNC to root for, so all's well.  My favorite time of basketball season, no offense to the NBA. 

Well, Cuse got their 3 seed, but they're facing a possible Sweet 16 game against UNC.  Should be a nice house divided game with the fiancee and a lot of my friends on each side.  Hope it goes down that way.

But what is with the two lowest #1 seeds (Pitt and Duke) having the two easiest brackets?  Never know how it'll shake out but Ohio St and Kansas seem to have much tougher roads ahead of them.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: GreenFaith1819 on March 13, 2011, 08:41:17 PM
I bet 'Cuse still gets a decent seeding, though. Sunday's selection committee will be interesting.

Hoping for a 3 seed, but I think a 4 is more likely.

And I've still got my #2 team UNC to root for, so all's well.  My favorite time of basketball season, no offense to the NBA. 

Well, Cuse got their 3 seed, but they're facing a possible Sweet 16 game against UNC.  Should be a nice house divided game with the fiancee and a lot of my friends on each side.  Hope it goes down that way.

But what is with the two lowest #1 seeds (Pitt and Duke) having the two easiest brackets?  Never know how it'll shake out but Ohio St and Kansas seem to have much tougher roads ahead of them.

That's interesting...I haven't seen the brackets yet, but it seems funny that Duke gets a seemingly easy bracket. There have been some rumblings in the past about their placements.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on March 13, 2011, 11:08:02 PM
Without studying the bracket yet... I'm going with Duke to repeat.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Onslaught on March 14, 2011, 12:12:56 AM
Without studying the bracket yet... I'm going with Duke to repeat.
I'm a Duke fan. But I don't see this going down. One game where the 3 isn't going down and it's over with. I never thought in a million years I'd say this....... they need Zoubek to win.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Bahku on March 14, 2011, 08:10:39 AM
This has got to be, without question, one of the most frustrating, perplexing seedings that the NCAA has had in recent memory ... I am absolutely dumbfounded at some of these picks. The people responsible either know absolutely nothing about college basketball, or were secretly drugged en masse before making the decisions. :P
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on March 14, 2011, 03:23:14 PM
This has got to be, without question, one of the most frustrating, perplexing seedings that the NCAA has had in recent memory ... I am absolutely dumbfounded at some of these picks. The people responsible either know absolutely nothing about college basketball, or were secretly drugged en masse before making the decisions. :P

Very questionable "First Four" at large selections and questionable seedings for some of the teams in the bracket.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: RebusRankin on March 14, 2011, 03:46:38 PM
Exactly. Some weird pairing, seedings, ahh who knows.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Donoghus on March 14, 2011, 03:48:15 PM
I haven't seen a year like this since the 'Melo/Cuse run in '03. 

No super teams and big enough question marks with the top seeds where it really might come down to whoever is the hottest team and, not necessarily, the best team or close to best team on paper. 
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: CDawg834 on March 15, 2011, 09:38:28 AM
This has got to be, without question, one of the most frustrating, perplexing seedings that the NCAA has had in recent memory ... I am absolutely dumbfounded at some of these picks. The people responsible either know absolutely nothing about college basketball, or were secretly drugged en masse before making the decisions. :P

Very questionable "First Four" at large selections and questionable seedings for some of the teams in the bracket.

I'd agree that UAB and VCU getting in over say, Colorado, Virginia Tech, or Saint Mary's is surprising.  But I'm so tired of all these coaches whining and crying every time their team isn't picked.  Seth Greenberg does it every year, and St. Mary's coach Randy Bennett was shown on SportsCenter last night griping.

These teams all had ample opportunities to show they belonged in the tournament, and they all lost games they should have (or needed to) win.  VT got the huge win against Duke, then choked at home against BC.  St. Mary's lost to San Diego, which according to the experts is one of the worst teams in D1 this year.  If you want to go to the tournament so bad, win the games you need to win.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Rondo2287 on March 15, 2011, 09:40:41 AM
This has got to be, without question, one of the most frustrating, perplexing seedings that the NCAA has had in recent memory ... I am absolutely dumbfounded at some of these picks. The people responsible either know absolutely nothing about college basketball, or were secretly drugged en masse before making the decisions. :P

Very questionable "First Four" at large selections and questionable seedings for some of the teams in the bracket.

I'd agree that UAB and VCU getting in over say, Colorado, Virginia Tech, or Saint Mary's is surprising.  But I'm so tired of all these coaches whining and crying every time their team isn't picked.  Seth Greenberg does it every year, and St. Mary's coach Randy Bennett was shown on SportsCenter last night griping.

These teams all had ample opportunities to show they belonged in the tournament, and they all lost games they should have (or needed to) win.  VT got the huge win against Duke, then choked at home against BC.  St. Mary's lost to San Diego, which according to the experts is one of the worst teams in D1 this year.  If you want to go to the tournament so bad, win the games you need to win.

BC Swept VT this year, had a better RPI and SOS than VT.  There is no way VT should have gotten in and BC shouldnt.  I think both being number one seeds in the NIT was the right call
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on March 15, 2011, 10:26:56 AM
This has got to be, without question, one of the most frustrating, perplexing seedings that the NCAA has had in recent memory ... I am absolutely dumbfounded at some of these picks. The people responsible either know absolutely nothing about college basketball, or were secretly drugged en masse before making the decisions. :P

Very questionable "First Four" at large selections and questionable seedings for some of the teams in the bracket.

I'd agree that UAB and VCU getting in over say, Colorado, Virginia Tech, or Saint Mary's is surprising.  But I'm so tired of all these coaches whining and crying every time their team isn't picked.  Seth Greenberg does it every year, and St. Mary's coach Randy Bennett was shown on SportsCenter last night griping.

These teams all had ample opportunities to show they belonged in the tournament, and they all lost games they should have (or needed to) win.  VT got the huge win against Duke, then choked at home against BC.  St. Mary's lost to San Diego, which according to the experts is one of the worst teams in D1 this year.  If you want to go to the tournament so bad, win the games you need to win.

VT didn't blow there chances by losing to a pretty good BC squad.  They lost their chance by getting swept by Virginia.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: CDawg834 on March 15, 2011, 10:45:33 AM
This has got to be, without question, one of the most frustrating, perplexing seedings that the NCAA has had in recent memory ... I am absolutely dumbfounded at some of these picks. The people responsible either know absolutely nothing about college basketball, or were secretly drugged en masse before making the decisions. :P

Very questionable "First Four" at large selections and questionable seedings for some of the teams in the bracket.

I'd agree that UAB and VCU getting in over say, Colorado, Virginia Tech, or Saint Mary's is surprising.  But I'm so tired of all these coaches whining and crying every time their team isn't picked.  Seth Greenberg does it every year, and St. Mary's coach Randy Bennett was shown on SportsCenter last night griping.

These teams all had ample opportunities to show they belonged in the tournament, and they all lost games they should have (or needed to) win.  VT got the huge win against Duke, then choked at home against BC.  St. Mary's lost to San Diego, which according to the experts is one of the worst teams in D1 this year.  If you want to go to the tournament so bad, win the games you need to win.

VT didn't blow there chances by losing to a pretty good BC squad.  They lost their chance by getting swept by Virginia.

You're probably right on that one, but my overall point was more that this year's bubble teams had plenty of winnable games and didn't take advantage of them, and that game was just one example.  While the BC loss may not have been the one that kept VT out, a win would have certainly helped their cause.  BC, in turn, got embarrassed against fellow bubble team Clemson.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Donoghus on March 15, 2011, 10:48:07 AM
BC didn't deserve to be in nor belonged in the tournament.

- A BC Alum
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Rondo2287 on March 15, 2011, 10:54:20 AM
BC didn't deserve to be in nor belonged in the tournament.

- A BC Alum

I think it depends, the team that beat VT the second time around Deserved to be in, the team that lost to clemson didnt deserve to be in the ACC tourney.  But thats the problem when you have a team that lives and dies by the three and doesnt play much D
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Donoghus on March 15, 2011, 11:03:58 AM
BC didn't deserve to be in nor belonged in the tournament.

- A BC Alum

I think it depends, the team that beat VT the second time around Deserved to be in, the team that lost to clemson didnt deserve to be in the ACC tourney.  But thats the problem when you have a team that lives and dies by the three and doesnt play much D

When you're the proverbial "bubble team" with everything to play for and you go out and lay an absolute egg with a 20+ pt loss to another bubble team, there are no more excuses.  They had everything to play for and they didn't show up. 

They put themselves in that position in the first place and fell flat on their face.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Rondo2287 on March 15, 2011, 11:13:37 AM
BC didn't deserve to be in nor belonged in the tournament.

- A BC Alum

I think it depends, the team that beat VT the second time around Deserved to be in, the team that lost to clemson didnt deserve to be in the ACC tourney.  But thats the problem when you have a team that lives and dies by the three and doesnt play much D

When you're the proverbial "bubble team" with everything to play for and you go out and lay an absolute egg with a 20+ pt loss to another bubble team, there are no more excuses.  They had everything to play for and they didn't show up. 

They put themselves in that position in the first place and fell flat on their face.

Don't get me wrong I agree, I think they deserve to be in the NIT.  And the fact that they are playing away as the number seed at mcneese state is pretty telling, but the idea that VT got snubbed and BC didnt is preposterous to me.  BC beat VT heads up twice, had a better RPI and SOS.  I don't think either team deserved to be in, I was just saying VT doesnt have a leg to stand on
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: CDawg834 on March 15, 2011, 11:21:23 AM
BC didn't deserve to be in nor belonged in the tournament.

- A BC Alum

I think it depends, the team that beat VT the second time around Deserved to be in, the team that lost to clemson didnt deserve to be in the ACC tourney.  But thats the problem when you have a team that lives and dies by the three and doesnt play much D

When you're the proverbial "bubble team" with everything to play for and you go out and lay an absolute egg with a 20+ pt loss to another bubble team, there are no more excuses.  They had everything to play for and they didn't show up. 

They put themselves in that position in the first place and fell flat on their face.

Don't get me wrong I agree, I think they deserve to be in the NIT.  And the fact that they are playing away as the number seed at mcneese state is pretty telling, but the idea that VT got snubbed and BC didnt is preposterous to me.  BC beat VT heads up twice, had a better RPI and SOS.  I don't think either team deserved to be in, I was just saying VT doesnt have a leg to stand on

Honestly I would have rather seen Harvard get in over BC or VT.  At least the Crimson played like they wanted to go to the tournament.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Donoghus on March 15, 2011, 11:23:15 AM
BC didn't deserve to be in nor belonged in the tournament.

- A BC Alum

I think it depends, the team that beat VT the second time around Deserved to be in, the team that lost to clemson didnt deserve to be in the ACC tourney.  But thats the problem when you have a team that lives and dies by the three and doesnt play much D

When you're the proverbial "bubble team" with everything to play for and you go out and lay an absolute egg with a 20+ pt loss to another bubble team, there are no more excuses.  They had everything to play for and they didn't show up. 

They put themselves in that position in the first place and fell flat on their face.

Don't get me wrong I agree, I think they deserve to be in the NIT.  And the fact that they are playing away as the number seed at mcneese state is pretty telling, but the idea that VT got snubbed and BC didnt is preposterous to me.  BC beat VT heads up twice, had a better RPI and SOS.  I don't think either team deserved to be in, I was just saying VT doesnt have a leg to stand on

VTech's upset of Duke in front of a national television audience is why some are up in arms about their snub.  Plus, their coach is being pretty vocal about it to anyone who will listen.


BC playing a road game as a #1 seed in the NIT is an absolute joke.  The school is doing it under the guise of "having the arena at the disposal of the men & women's hockey teams" when, in reality, DeFillipo is scared that no one would show up.  The poor thing is that the kids now have to travel to some backwoods town in LA rather than play at the comforts of home because the administration is too scared of what Conte might look like.  
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Rondo2287 on March 15, 2011, 11:26:18 AM
BC didn't deserve to be in nor belonged in the tournament.

- A BC Alum

I think it depends, the team that beat VT the second time around Deserved to be in, the team that lost to clemson didnt deserve to be in the ACC tourney.  But thats the problem when you have a team that lives and dies by the three and doesnt play much D

When you're the proverbial "bubble team" with everything to play for and you go out and lay an absolute egg with a 20+ pt loss to another bubble team, there are no more excuses.  They had everything to play for and they didn't show up. 

They put themselves in that position in the first place and fell flat on their face.

Don't get me wrong I agree, I think they deserve to be in the NIT.  And the fact that they are playing away as the number seed at mcneese state is pretty telling, but the idea that VT got snubbed and BC didnt is preposterous to me.  BC beat VT heads up twice, had a better RPI and SOS.  I don't think either team deserved to be in, I was just saying VT doesnt have a leg to stand on

VTech's upset of Duke in front of a national television audience is why some are up in arms about their snub.  Plus, their coach is being pretty vocal about it to anyone who will listen.


BC playing a road game as a #1 seed in the NIT is an absolute joke.  The school is doing it under the guise of "having the arena at the disposal of the men & women's hockey teams" when, in reality, DeFillipo is scared that no one would show up.  The poor thing is that the kids now have to travel to some backwoods town in LA rather than play at the comforts of home because the administration is too scared of what Conte might look like.  

Well didnt the womens hockey team just play a tournament game infront of an announced audience of 548?  I think they are worried they are going to have to take another loss on a postseason game.  Doesnt the NCAA regulate ticket prices for the postseason games so prices go up so even less people would go?
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Donoghus on March 15, 2011, 11:26:30 AM
BC didn't deserve to be in nor belonged in the tournament.

- A BC Alum

I think it depends, the team that beat VT the second time around Deserved to be in, the team that lost to clemson didnt deserve to be in the ACC tourney.  But thats the problem when you have a team that lives and dies by the three and doesnt play much D

When you're the proverbial "bubble team" with everything to play for and you go out and lay an absolute egg with a 20+ pt loss to another bubble team, there are no more excuses.  They had everything to play for and they didn't show up. 

They put themselves in that position in the first place and fell flat on their face.

Don't get me wrong I agree, I think they deserve to be in the NIT.  And the fact that they are playing away as the number seed at mcneese state is pretty telling, but the idea that VT got snubbed and BC didnt is preposterous to me.  BC beat VT heads up twice, had a better RPI and SOS.  I don't think either team deserved to be in, I was just saying VT doesnt have a leg to stand on

Honestly I would have rather seen Harvard get in over BC or VT.  At least the Crimson played like they wanted to go to the tournament.

I agree with that.  That might've been the first time I've pulled for the Crimson in something.  Gotta feel for those kids to lose the way they did.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: CDawg834 on March 15, 2011, 11:27:12 AM
Gotta give credit where it's due to BC coach Steve Donahue.  From WEEI.com:

"Boston College coach Steve Donahue spoke to the media Sunday night after learning that his team was not selected for the NCAA tournament. Donahue, who accepted an invitation for the NIT, said he was saddened for his seniors but not shocked by the selection committee's decision.

"We got what we deserved. That's the bottom line," Donahue said. "We've got to work harder, we've got to do things better.""

I respect him for coming out and admitting that their fate was in their own hands and they didn't take advantage, rather than the opposite approach Seth Greenberg has taken the past 4 years.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Donoghus on March 15, 2011, 11:32:04 AM
BC didn't deserve to be in nor belonged in the tournament.

- A BC Alum

I think it depends, the team that beat VT the second time around Deserved to be in, the team that lost to clemson didnt deserve to be in the ACC tourney.  But thats the problem when you have a team that lives and dies by the three and doesnt play much D

When you're the proverbial "bubble team" with everything to play for and you go out and lay an absolute egg with a 20+ pt loss to another bubble team, there are no more excuses.  They had everything to play for and they didn't show up. 

They put themselves in that position in the first place and fell flat on their face.

Don't get me wrong I agree, I think they deserve to be in the NIT.  And the fact that they are playing away as the number seed at mcneese state is pretty telling, but the idea that VT got snubbed and BC didnt is preposterous to me.  BC beat VT heads up twice, had a better RPI and SOS.  I don't think either team deserved to be in, I was just saying VT doesnt have a leg to stand on

VTech's upset of Duke in front of a national television audience is why some are up in arms about their snub.  Plus, their coach is being pretty vocal about it to anyone who will listen.


BC playing a road game as a #1 seed in the NIT is an absolute joke.  The school is doing it under the guise of "having the arena at the disposal of the men & women's hockey teams" when, in reality, DeFillipo is scared that no one would show up.  The poor thing is that the kids now have to travel to some backwoods town in LA rather than play at the comforts of home because the administration is too scared of what Conte might look like.  

Well didnt the womens hockey team just play a tournament game infront of an announced audience of 548?  I think they are worried they are going to have to take another loss on a postseason game.  Doesnt the NCAA regulate ticket prices for the postseason games so prices go up so even less people would go?

That's women hockey.  No offense to the women but my guess is that number is probably running near the average to what they draw to a game. 

I have no idea about the money but it shouldn't matter.  The school should be behind their team 100% and open their arms to hosting a game if given the opportunity.  The school shouldn't be shipping their kids off to Louisiana for a game that should be played at home.  To me, its inexcusable. 
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Rondo2287 on March 15, 2011, 04:06:13 PM
Well Don's if BC and Northwestern advance BC will host them in the second round.  They must figure a big 10 school can draw some more interest.

http://twitter.com/WillhiteHerald/status/47681269567471617#

Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Donoghus on March 15, 2011, 04:31:15 PM
Well Don's if BC and Northwestern advance BC will host them in the second round.  They must figure a big 10 school can draw some more interest.

http://twitter.com/WillhiteHerald/status/47681269567471617#



Of course, the one time that I want them to be on the road (considering I live in Chicago and Evanston is a short train ride away) and they decide to play home.  Ughh..    :P
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: CDawg834 on March 15, 2011, 08:04:27 PM
A bit off topic, but those of you with FIOS TV in the Boston area, they've added TruTV HD in time for the NCAA tournament.  Now all games will be in HD.  Channel 683
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on March 15, 2011, 08:45:29 PM
Pretty god first of the "First Four" games going on. 
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Mike-Dub on March 15, 2011, 08:57:49 PM
UNC Ashville just hit a three to tie it with ten seconds left!
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Rondo2287 on March 16, 2011, 11:19:20 AM
http://www.bcinterruption.com/2011/3/16/2053928/ncaa-tournament-bubble-burst-boston-college-harvard-virginia-tech


Pretty great article on the BC SBNation site.  Basically breaking down why Seth Greenberg needs to shut it.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Rondo2287 on March 17, 2011, 08:27:32 AM
Pretty stoked, just got my tickets for the Northwestern vs BC NIT game saturday morning at 11am.  Im pumped they scheduled it before the Other games are supposed to start. 

Hopefully this goes better than the BC UNC game i went to earlier this year where UNC put up over 100 on BC.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Eja117 on May 24, 2011, 07:48:56 AM
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=6580565


wow. The Penn State coach is leaving for Navy.  I find the whole thing weird.  He led that team to more success than it really ever had and PSU is his alma matter.

Just awful.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Moranis on May 24, 2011, 08:34:09 AM
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=6580565


wow. The Penn State coach is leaving for Navy.  I find the whole thing weird.  He led that team to more success than it really ever had and PSU is his alma matter.

Just awful.
If Penn State wanted to keep him all they had to do was show him some love with a contract extension.  PSU did not and that is the price it paid.
Title: Re: NCAA Basketball 2010 - 2011
Post by: Eja117 on May 24, 2011, 09:16:44 AM
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=6580565


wow. The Penn State coach is leaving for Navy.  I find the whole thing weird.  He led that team to more success than it really ever had and PSU is his alma matter.

Just awful.
If Penn State wanted to keep him all they had to do was show him some love with a contract extension.  PSU did not and that is the price it paid.
I totally agree.  Maybe they don't actually want to have a good basketball team, which strikes me odd because I don't see the downside and their arena is phenomenal.

You'd think he would have approached them and said "I have an offer from Navy" and they'd be like "Code Red!  You are not leaving this office till you've signed an extension!"

But now they have to get a new coach during a rebuilding season. Just stupid