Author Topic: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15  (Read 45126 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #105 on: November 22, 2015, 06:57:58 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
Why are we also leaving Bargnani open? I don't get it.

This guy is only good at one thing. And that's shooting.

So why give a 7 footer with a good shooting touch, free range to do so?
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #106 on: November 22, 2015, 06:58:00 PM »

Offline Rosco917

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6108
  • Tommy Points: 559
Not having Smart makes a difference for the Celts' rotation.  One of the few guys it really hurts them to lose. 

Thomas, Amir, Smart, Crowder.  Hurts the Celts a lot to have any of those guys miss significant time.



Smart is one of those guy's that get tough, when things don't go well. 

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #107 on: November 22, 2015, 06:58:02 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Quick Danny, trade the Brooklyn pick for cousins before the league figures out Brooklyn found their rhythm.

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #108 on: November 22, 2015, 06:58:24 PM »

Offline mr. dee

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7866
  • Tommy Points: 601
This team looks deflated without Smart.

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #109 on: November 22, 2015, 06:58:55 PM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
Celtics with 9 turnovers already

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #110 on: November 22, 2015, 06:59:10 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
The upside of this game might be that people won't be so eager to scoff at the notion that Brooklyn is not the Sixersian tankfest we all want them to be.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #111 on: November 22, 2015, 06:59:26 PM »

Offline CelticSooner

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11609
  • Tommy Points: 874
  • GOT IT!!!
Quick Danny, trade the Brooklyn pick for cousins before the league figures out Brooklyn found their rhythm.

Give it up already. C's will make this a game regardless.

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #112 on: November 22, 2015, 06:59:31 PM »

Offline Vox_Populi

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4468
  • Tommy Points: 346
Isaiah's ability to get the line will help us.

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #113 on: November 22, 2015, 07:00:34 PM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
Isaiah's ability to get the line will help us.

We've only taken 4 foul shots so far in this game.

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #114 on: November 22, 2015, 07:00:34 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Not having Smart makes a difference for the Celts' rotation.  One of the few guys it really hurts them to lose. 

Thomas, Amir, Smart, Crowder.  Hurts the Celts a lot to have any of those guys miss significant time.

I agree.

Smart's impact on defense really sets the tone. You can tell it in opposing point guards or shooting guards when their dribbling the ball at the top of the key or the perimeter, and how scared they seem to try to lose it.
I disagree. This game is more about Brooklyn's bench showing some life than anything.  Nets have been in a lot of close games against good teams this year.  Their bench has been non existent. 

I do think that a Thomas and Bradley back court is a defensive liability, though.  Too small.

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #115 on: November 22, 2015, 07:00:34 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Celts aren't shooting well from outside and they've only forced 6 turnovers so far in the half.

Those are two strong indicators for how this team is going to fare in any given game.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #116 on: November 22, 2015, 07:00:59 PM »

Offline mr. dee

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7866
  • Tommy Points: 601
Good thing Nets missing freebies.

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #117 on: November 22, 2015, 07:01:13 PM »

Offline Vox_Populi

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4468
  • Tommy Points: 346
The upside of this game might be that people won't be so eager to scoff at the notion that Brooklyn is not the Sixersian tankfest we all want them to be.
Because they might beat the Celtics? They're 2-11. We have over 620 minutes of evidence they're terrible. They have a bottom 3 differential. They're not the the Sixers, but my word, you guys are persistent.

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #118 on: November 22, 2015, 07:01:29 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
The upside of this game might be that people won't be so eager to scoff at the notion that Brooklyn is not the Sixersian tankfest we all want them to be.

The Nets are also 5-7 with 71.4% on 3pt... That isn't going to be sustainable. I think if Lopez is injured, the Nets are about as good as the Lakers and Sixers for top 3 worst teams in the NBA.
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #119 on: November 22, 2015, 07:01:43 PM »

Offline esel1000

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11547
  • Tommy Points: 587
What type of call is that???