I disagree. Even with a relative lack of pressure, most QBs aren’t going to hit their passes with the crispness, touch and accuracy that Foles did. He put the ball exactly where it needed to be.
Here's where I end up on this.
Foles played a good game. He showed he belonged on that stage in that role.
The Patriots defense was terrible, hardly putting up any resistance apart from a flukey interception.
The Eagles had 164 rushing yards on 27 rushes. Foles was not sacked in the game. I can't find the hurry / pressure stats, but my impression is that Foles was hurried / pressured far less than Brady, especially in the fourth quarter.
Both teams got most of what they wanted on offense. That's a testament to two quarterbacks who played a hell of a game, as well as various skill players on both sides that performed well.
The Eagles got pressure at the end, which resulted in a stop when they really needed one. They were able to run the ball for positive yardage whenever they needed to. They could probably have held onto the ball for even more of the game than they did, if they had tried to really eat clock.
The Pats lost the time of possession battle by almost 10 minutes, due in large part to their inability to stop the run, and they ultimately could not get a stop when they needed one in the fourth quarter.
In a game that was very close, I would argue the battle that ended up mattering the most was the Eagles offensive line versus the Patriots defensive line. The Patriots lost that battle decisively.