Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think either guy is sure thing or even close to that. But of all the skills each guy possesses, the only one we know of nba level is Romeos defense. And I’ll be honest, I think nesmiths defense is atrocious. His lateral quickness is enes kanter level. It may make him unplayable. Summer league guys were going at him.
In terms of offense, nesmith obviously has more potential. But I’m not sure actually a good offensive player in the nba. He needs to be a 40% shooter to have a chance, and I’m concerned about him missing wide open shots, and in that last game, he had some god awful misses. Misses you don’t see in a pure shooter. Not counting him out but not a sure thing. And I don’t see anything else he can contribute on offense.
Oddly, Romeo like a week younger too.
Lateral quickness is the most overused term on this site. Players more often than not get beat because of uncertainty. His quickness and athleticism are fine. Your comparison is absurd.
I still have hope for Romeo, but he can't shoot. Shooting is the most important skill in the sport now, and Nesmith is very good at it, and Romeo isn't. If Romeo doesn't start showing he can find ways to get the ball in the bucket, I suspect we're about to watch his final season in green.
Thats cool; but your statement doesn’t mean anything. I can do a cut up of Nesmiths defensive possessions against non nba players that shows my point. Frankly, his lateral quickness is far from fine.
Yet he was able to put up consistently strong scoring performances against pretty much every summer league team he played against, while Romeo was utterly incapable of any type of consistent offensive production against summer league talent, nor was he able to put up competent offensive production against G league competition in the past - the same G league fodder that guys like Jordan Mickey, James Young and Taco Fall absolutely dominated.
The problem with your evaluation is that you seem to look at this as there is only one dimension to basketball - one on one defence. That's just not the realistic. Romeo holding his opponent to 15 points instead of 19 points ultimately doesn't mean much if he is so bad on the offensive and that teams can completely ignore him, double/trap teammates, and the teams offensive efficiency. Romeo is probably the worst offensive player we have had on a Celtics roster in the past decade. We do not have enough scoring on this roster right now to be able to compensate for one completely useless offensive player being on the court.
We DO have enough defensive talent on the roster to be able to cover for one poor defender being on the court, and for that reason I think no matter how bad Nesmith could be on D, he'll never hurt the team as much as Romeo does.
Nesmith also has another plus - he's not injured 70% of the time. Oh and he actually plays hard, unlike Romeo who seems to stand around aimlessly like he was just frozen in ice for 80 years.