I feel like Danny needs to get the most blame for this season. Team lacks size, experience, and talent outside of the starting lineup. Average age of the C’s starters is 25. Average age of the bench is 24.No depth at all...
As a comparison, the Heat starters: Butler(31) Bam(23)Ariza(35) Robinson(27) Oladipo(28)
Rotation players: Dragic(34)Iguadala(37)Nunn(25) Herro(21), Dedmon(35)
Need a roster balanced with vets and younger players. With the way the bench is constructed, you’d think the C’s were going through a rebuild vs a team that made it to the ECF last year.
Danny is responsible...
He did add Fournier and Thompson to the roster. Two very solid vets. And we were in the ECF last year. I feel like a lot of this criticism is in hindsight. How much do you want Ainge rocking the boat on what looked to be a team on the rise?
I don’t think it’s hindsight. Our bench was a problem last season, and it still is. Essentially we have replaced Theis with Thompson (downgrade) and Hayward with Fournier (downgrade). On one hand, Danny’s hands are tied by being limited to the MLE and vet minimums, while wanting to operate under the luxury tax. On the other, Danny created this roster crunch and cap situation, and there were cheap options available that he passed on.
The bench has been a problem for years and the team keeps replacing better players with worse ones. Walker and Fournier were basically the only replacements for Irving, Horford, and Hayward. That isn't going to cut it. Then you start talking about the rotation players like Rozier, Morris, and Theis and the replacements for them are basically Thompson, R. Williams, and Nesmith. That just doesn't get it done. Walker was a terrible fit with Tatum and Brown and never should have been signed. The team doesn't have a real PF on the roster and hasn't in a couple of seasons. The team is an ill fitting conglomeration of asset accumulation and with no semblance of team building. Ainge's inability to pick a direction and a path and stick to it, has created the bloated salary, poorly constructed mess. Tatum is a potential monster and Brown is very good, but outside of that, there are problems every where and the GM is 100% to blame for this mess of a roster.
I’m not sure there was anything Ainge could have done differently. He assembled a championship-caliber roster in 2017. Irving-Brown-Hayward-Tatum-Horford with Rozier/Smart/Morris/Theis off the bench was most definitely a contender.
We all know the injury (and subsequent fallout) changed the course of that group. From there, you had Horford chase money and Kyrie unhappy. Horford shouldn’t have been matched, that was the right move by Ainge. Kyrie is Kyrie. Seldom are his words/actions rational, so I don’t believe anyone could have convinced him to stay (nor do I directly fault Ainge or Stevens for his unhappiness). Pivoting to Kemba, in hindsight, appears to be a mistake. Would we have been better with Rozier? Or doing nothing? Perhaps, but that doesn’t get us significantly closer to contending, IMO.
The only other question Mark was the Hayward debacle. It’s hard to know what exactly Indy offered, and whether the Charlotte offer would have been matched (or would it even need to be) by them. If Ainge doesn’t like Turner, I don’t blame him for not pulling the trigger (whilst helping a conference rival in the process).
All in all, his draft record is pretty solid so I won’t get on him too much for Langford or Nesmith, as they have both shown flashes of being impact players.
Simply put, I don’t really know what Ainge could do other than going through a complete overhaul/rebuild after losing 3 max players in 2 seasons.