Im actually pretty high on our moves. Its pretty obvious what danny saw here.
Without giving up much, we replace Haywards production (dont crush me here) Fournier is really a hayward-lite type player. A bit better of a shooter, not quite as smart or as quality overall, but that was kind of the issue with Hayward, right? He knew he deserved a bigger role. Fournier seems like the right choice to replace him without the need for more responsibility. Whats more, he will probably cost us per year what we wanted to pay Hayward. I think this is best case scenario, within what was a actual possibility.
Second, losing theis sucks. But, its easy to see why danny likes Mo. Dude competes, plays super hard, and has had some observable success playing at a high level of basketball. Kind of seems like a Brad Stevens guy, I could see this move being one that maximizes the potential value here - not saying Mo has a high ceiling, but I think he could fill a similar role to Theis. He seems like a similar guy, a bit different profile in terms of defense. But, IMO its easy to see why and how Danny rationalized this one.
Overall, I think we just got better in a few areas. Its not like we were this horrible team before the trade, we were having some struggles and needed a change, for sure. I really feel like what Danny pulled off here is as good as it could be. We still get to see what Romeo and Neismith are made of, we didnt lose Smart - which again is a win - the dude is a confidence and loyalty guy. It wouldn't surprise that Danny knows this, floating his name out then having the ability to come out and say "no way, i'm not trading smart for anything other than an all star" probably means a lot to Smart. If this is calculated, it was ....smart.
Im in on these moves, I think they protect the long term plan Danny has put in place, makes us better in the now, expresses belief and loyalty in the core group, while also giving us flexibility in the future.