The Celtics are pretty much the same besides adding Thornton, Zeller, Smart, and Young. I don't really see any of those guys making such a dramatic difference in wins and losses this season.
Thornton>Bayliss
Smart>Pressley
Turner>Wallace
Zeller/Anthony>Humphries/Sully, strictly when talking about better fits at center.
Add in that Rondo, Sully and KO should all reasonably see some improvement over last season.
Mike
No love for Lee and Crawford?
Our guard rotation is about as talented as it was last year. Our wing rotation is about as talented as it was last year. Our big man rotation is about as talented as it was last year.
I think we'll be better, but my suspicion is that we're not winning more than 31 games.
I'm looking at the team that finished out the year, not the one where Lee and Crawford were gone just as Rondo started to play.
So, it probably should have been Turner>Chris Johnson.
Either way, Turner is going to be better than whomever was Boston's backup SF last year, even if his own play doesn't improve a bit. Smart is also going to immediately be better than Pressey, even if he shoots just as poorly. At their age, both KO and Sully should show some improvement and with Zeller, Vitor and Anthony on the roster, they should spend far less time being outmatched at center. Rondo should also be better with the knee injury further behind him.
Now, there were reason beyond just talent for why Boston lost so many games last year. Rondo brought the offense to a stop too often. The team's rotations needed work and they just flat out imploded when teams put pressure on them in the second half. I'm not sure a modest improvement in talent and roster balance will fix those things. But if those things can be fixed along with a talent boost, Boston could be surprisingly good next year.
Again, NOBODY thought the Suns were going to win like they did last season.
Mike