I tend to agree with D Dub. I think the more questionable calls will go the Lakers way in Game 3, but even so, if the teams play with the same aggression they played with in Game 2, the Celtics will still have an advantage on the FT line even if more calls go to the Lakers. Last night was 38-10 I think. Without any questionable calls, based on the game played, that probably becomes something like 35-17 (Kobe should have gotten to the line a couple more times, maybe Powe gets 10 instead of 13 FTs). Bottom line, the free throw difference was not just referees, it was helped because the Lakers weren't aggressive.
If the Lakers get those borderline/dubious calls, that 35-17 would probably switch to something like 28-25, but still in favor of the Celtics. We just get the ball in the post more, and while Kobe is certainly a better offensive player than Ray Allen is a defender (talk about understatement), Allen is staying in front of Kobe, while, on the other side, Radmanovic cannot stay in front of Pierce. Plus, when Kobe does get by Allen, our help defense is always waiting for him outside the paint. The same is not true when Pierce blows by Radmanovic - he gets to the lane, where a foul is more likely to be called.
Unless the Lakers can remedy that - get Odom and Gasol more involved, for one, which might open up more space for Kobe to get into the paint - the free throw advantage will stay with the Celtics. Their game plan needs to change, namely, they need to be more aggressive offensively. And Radmanovic should be removed - he's just a bad matchup in this series. The Lakers would be better served giving more playing time to Walton, Ariza, and even going 3 guards by throwing in Vujacic or Farmar with Fisher and Kobe, letting Kobe stay in front of Pierce (though this may help the Celtics too, as Pierce can conceivably sap Kobe's energy. Kobe's a strong guy but Pierce is bigger and stronger).
Bottom line, every team has weaknesses. The fact is, the Celtics are able to exploit the Lakers' weaknesses - rebounding and defense, particularly stopping penetration - in a way no team other than Utah could during the Lakers' playoff run. Factor in that Boston can play defense much better than Utah and the 2-0 lead is no surprise. I expect the Lakers to adjust well and win at least 2 games in LA by emphasizing their offensive versatility. But they really need to win 3. I think they take 2, the Celtics take 1, and finish it off in 6. But LA has 3 home games to take a lot of momentum if they rise to the challenge.
Incidentally, I don't think it will be as good for LA if the refs hand them game three. They need to win a game on their own to get their confidence back up.