Before we really debate Simmons value on the basketball court, go back and watch the playoffs last year.
There's no doubt he didn't want to shoot, but he did everything else on that team. He defended Young and Bradley Beal and John Collins. He sets up teammates so they can score. He helps on the weakside. He rebounds. He pushes tempo to compromise defenses.
He plays hard out there on the court. People want him to dominate as a scorer. He's probably not that even if he could be with a mental adjustment. But he's still an all-nba talent and a good teammate on the court that makes everyone better and fills all the gaps.
0-0 in 4 4th quarters.
Again, I get it; he's a good player. But I think he's just as polarising as Smart. Just perhaps with more higher highs (better play) and lower lows (refusing to practice, play, shoot, etc) ... (there's a word for that wild polarisation but it's escaping me lol)
.edit: volatile. The word I'm looking for is volatile.
He's a much better player than Smart that makes his teammates better. I haven't felt like Smart knows how to do that at the level Simmons does.
He's refusing to practice or play because he wants out of Philly. I don't love it. He's holding out in order to control his own destiny. Players have been doing that for a long time to get more money. It seems more like business to me than being a bad teammate.
He won't shoot because he thinks its better. Watch him on the court and see how hard he plays, how willing he is to do all the tough things that no one else can/will.
He doesn't want to be a scorer. He doesn't think he can succeed as a guy who shoots a lot. I don't mind that. That means he's a great fit next to two scorers.