Author Topic: Bucks (7-0) at Celtics (5-2) Game #8 11/1/18  (Read 39223 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Bucks (7-0) at Celtics (5-2) Game #8 11/1/18
« Reply #750 on: November 01, 2018, 10:50:32 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3141
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
Semi was probably my happiest surprise from tonight. Efficient shooting, good defence and some thunderous dunks
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Bucks (7-0) at Celtics (5-2) Game #8 11/1/18
« Reply #751 on: November 01, 2018, 10:50:44 PM »

Offline RockinRyA

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5572
  • Tommy Points: 699
Big board, Al!!!

Horford actually allowed Middleton to come around and get position on the baseline on that missed free throw - if the ball bounced the other way, we are tied. Baynes is the one that got us that rebound - he took his guy completely out and allowed Horford to grab the board.

so Horford shouldve dropped the ball then? Anyway you want to put it it was a huge play and Horford grabbed the rebound. Rebounding can be a team effort too, dont you know?

Re: Bucks (7-0) at Celtics (5-2) Game #8 11/1/18
« Reply #752 on: November 01, 2018, 10:50:55 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Kevin McHale
  • ************************
  • Posts: 24936
  • Tommy Points: 2704
Other than Morris , not great performance from our BWA.

Baynes did a great job, he's usually part of the BWA

Re: Bucks (7-0) at Celtics (5-2) Game #8 11/1/18
« Reply #753 on: November 01, 2018, 10:50:58 PM »

Offline Boris Badenov

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 1065
This is awful basketball by the Celtics win or lose can they do anything accept shoot a 3 or an off balanced  junper? Can they execute anything on offense besides shooting 3’s? I understand it’s a different game now and everyone shoots 3’s but my god 54 attempts??? They had Milwaukee down by 15 and continued to jack up 3’s while Milwaukee starting driving the paint. Just so boring to watch the Celtics jack up 3’ every possession create some [dang] offense.
If they hadn't been wide open and if we weren't winning this argument might hold. Our offence is designed to shoot threes

Which is why I'm starting to back up on my beating GS thinking.
Why? Houston was a healthy Chris Paul away from beating GSW, and that's how they play offensively too.

We're a much better defence than them too

It's not, actually. Shooting a lot of free throws is a key part of their offense (25 per game, 3rd in the league last year). We shot 13 FTs tonight. It really was just us jacking up the first open 3 we got.





Re: Bucks (7-0) at Celtics (5-2) Game #8 11/1/18
« Reply #754 on: November 01, 2018, 10:53:24 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3141
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
This is awful basketball by the Celtics win or lose can they do anything accept shoot a 3 or an off balanced  junper? Can they execute anything on offense besides shooting 3’s? I understand it’s a different game now and everyone shoots 3’s but my god 54 attempts??? They had Milwaukee down by 15 and continued to jack up 3’s while Milwaukee starting driving the paint. Just so boring to watch the Celtics jack up 3’ every possession create some [dang] offense.
If they hadn't been wide open and if we weren't winning this argument might hold. Our offence is designed to shoot threes

Which is why I'm starting to back up on my beating GS thinking.
Why? Houston was a healthy Chris Paul away from beating GSW, and that's how they play offensively too.

We're a much better defence than them too

It's not, actually. Shooting a lot of free throws is a key part of their offense (25 per game, 3rd in the league last year). We shot 13 FTs tonight. It really was just us jacking up the first open 3 we got.
Oh yeah, our offence is more 3 or mid-range rather than the key or three that D'Antoni loves. But the heavy reliance on deep shooting is the similarity.

We also don't have a Harden to just get free throws whenever he moves
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Bucks (7-0) at Celtics (5-2) Game #8 11/1/18
« Reply #755 on: November 01, 2018, 10:53:50 PM »

Online jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48295
  • Tommy Points: 2932
Other than Morris , not great performance from our BWA.

Brad needs to sit Rozier down about his apparently selfish, contract-chasing play so far.

Re: Bucks (7-0) at Celtics (5-2) Game #8 11/1/18
« Reply #756 on: November 01, 2018, 10:54:12 PM »

Offline manl_lui

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6571
  • Tommy Points: 427
great win boys!

Re: Bucks (7-0) at Celtics (5-2) Game #8 11/1/18
« Reply #757 on: November 01, 2018, 10:54:30 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3141
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
Other than Morris , not great performance from our BWA.

Brad needs to sit Rozier down about his apparently selfish, contract-chasing play so far.
Wonder if IT lent him his truck
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Bucks (7-0) at Celtics (5-2) Game #8 11/1/18
« Reply #758 on: November 01, 2018, 10:54:57 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14484
  • Tommy Points: 976
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
24 3s, only won by 4. Not a good statistic. I understand 3s are the chic thing right now but there needs to be a healthy balance. Cs barely get to the FT line. They need to be more aggressive attacking the paint.
One is not related to the other. The defense gave up 113 points.

Re: Bucks (7-0) at Celtics (5-2) Game #8 11/1/18
« Reply #759 on: November 01, 2018, 10:55:27 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3141
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
24 3s, only won by 4. Not a good statistic. I understand 3s are the chic thing right now but there needs to be a healthy balance. Cs barely get to the FT line. They need to be more aggressive attacking the paint.
One is not related to the other. The defense gave up 113 points.
And like, 50 points in the paint or so
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Bucks (7-0) at Celtics (5-2) Game #8 11/1/18
« Reply #760 on: November 01, 2018, 10:55:46 PM »

Offline tenn_smoothie

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6237
  • Tommy Points: 732
This is awful basketball by the Celtics win or lose can they do anything accept shoot a 3 or an off balanced  junper? Can they execute anything on offense besides shooting 3’s? I understand it’s a different game now and everyone shoots 3’s but my god 54 attempts??? They had Milwaukee down by 15 and continued to jack up 3’s while Milwaukee starting driving the paint. Just so boring to watch the Celtics jack up 3’ every possession create some [dang] offense.
If they hadn't been wide open and if we weren't winning this argument might hold. Our offence is designed to shoot threes

Which is why I'm starting to back up on my beating GS thinking.
Why? Houston was a healthy Chris Paul away from beating GSW, and that's how they play offensively too.

We're a much better defence than them too

Houston chucked themselves out of the series. The C's can easily do the same.
And they wouldn't have been able to win 3 games without their shooting. This argument can go in circles forever.

I'm not saying I like all the threes, but it's clearly our modus operandi

No they went up 3-2 by slowing the game down and playing tough hard defense. Then they started chucking 3's again and it cost them. You don't beat GS by trying to outscore them. I just don't like the offense and honestly never have under CBS. Everyone is allowed to take bad shots without consequence.

Yes, Yes and Yes. We are not Golden State - we have good inside scorers and are much better when we drive it or feed the post some. Plus, jacking all these 3's has hurt our offensive rebounding, which was greatly improved last year. Now Stevens has allowed Baynes to think he is a wing. Stevens has to be a tougher coach with his players - and don't tell me we don't know what is said in meetings or practice. It's obvious by shot selection that he is not correcting this problem. A record shooting night will only make things worse in the long run. Just look what happened late - we couldn't score down the stretch and almost blew an important game.
The Four Celtic Generals:
Russell - Cowens - Bird - Garnett

The Four Celtic Lieutenants:
Cousy - Havlicek - McHale - Pierce

Re: Bucks (7-0) at Celtics (5-2) Game #8 11/1/18
« Reply #761 on: November 01, 2018, 10:56:44 PM »

Offline Rosco917

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6108
  • Tommy Points: 559
Other than Morris , not great performance from our BWA.

Brad needs to sit Rozier down about his apparently selfish, contract-chasing play so far.



Agree with this, Terry is out of control much of the game. He looks for his and his alone.

Re: Bucks (7-0) at Celtics (5-2) Game #8 11/1/18
« Reply #762 on: November 01, 2018, 10:57:20 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3141
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
This is awful basketball by the Celtics win or lose can they do anything accept shoot a 3 or an off balanced  junper? Can they execute anything on offense besides shooting 3’s? I understand it’s a different game now and everyone shoots 3’s but my god 54 attempts??? They had Milwaukee down by 15 and continued to jack up 3’s while Milwaukee starting driving the paint. Just so boring to watch the Celtics jack up 3’ every possession create some [dang] offense.
If they hadn't been wide open and if we weren't winning this argument might hold. Our offence is designed to shoot threes

Which is why I'm starting to back up on my beating GS thinking.
Why? Houston was a healthy Chris Paul away from beating GSW, and that's how they play offensively too.

We're a much better defence than them too

Houston chucked themselves out of the series. The C's can easily do the same.
And they wouldn't have been able to win 3 games without their shooting. This argument can go in circles forever.

I'm not saying I like all the threes, but it's clearly our modus operandi

No they went up 3-2 by slowing the game down and playing tough hard defense. Then they started chucking 3's again and it cost them. You don't beat GS by trying to outscore them. I just don't like the offense and honestly never have under CBS. Everyone is allowed to take bad shots without consequence.

Yes, Yes and Yes. We are not Golden State - we have good inside scorers and are much better when we drive it or feed the post some. Plus, jacking all these 3's has hurt our offensive rebounding, which was greatly improved last year. Now Stevens has allowed Baynes to think he is a wing. Stevens has to be a tougher coach with his players - and don't tell me we don't know what is said in meetings or practice. It's obvious by shot selection that he is not correcting the bad shot selection. A record shooting night like this game will only make things worse in the long run. Just look what happened late - we couldn't score down the stretch and almost blew an important game.
100% agree. He needs to get onto Baynes and Rozier I think
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Bucks (7-0) at Celtics (5-2) Game #8 11/1/18
« Reply #763 on: November 01, 2018, 10:58:33 PM »

Offline Boston Garden Leprechaun

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18543
  • Tommy Points: 1557
The fact we're still getting wins against quality opponents while still having plenty of things to improve on is not a bad thing.

there's always work to be done

FOLLOW THE PROCESS
LET'S GO CELTICS!

Re: Bucks (7-0) at Celtics (5-2) Game #8 11/1/18
« Reply #764 on: November 01, 2018, 11:00:43 PM »

Offline Boris Badenov

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 1065
This is awful basketball by the Celtics win or lose can they do anything accept shoot a 3 or an off balanced  junper? Can they execute anything on offense besides shooting 3’s? I understand it’s a different game now and everyone shoots 3’s but my god 54 attempts??? They had Milwaukee down by 15 and continued to jack up 3’s while Milwaukee starting driving the paint. Just so boring to watch the Celtics jack up 3’ every possession create some [dang] offense.
If they hadn't been wide open and if we weren't winning this argument might hold. Our offence is designed to shoot threes

Which is why I'm starting to back up on my beating GS thinking.
Why? Houston was a healthy Chris Paul away from beating GSW, and that's how they play offensively too.

We're a much better defence than them too

It's not, actually. Shooting a lot of free throws is a key part of their offense (25 per game, 3rd in the league last year). We shot 13 FTs tonight. It really was just us jacking up the first open 3 we got.
Oh yeah, our offence is more 3 or mid-range rather than the key or three that D'Antoni loves. But the heavy reliance on deep shooting is the similarity.

We also don't have a Harden to just get free throws whenever he moves

More drive-and-kick from TR and KI would help. And a few post-ups by Smart and Horford.

In a way we are cursed by our talent. We get good shots really easily, and guys are shooting it. We need to hit that level where we pass up the good shot for the *great* shot. If we can do that, we will start destroying people.