Watched HS and college vids on Romeo and he just didn't look like more than a "draft pick".
Even in g league, he looks ok, but not spectacular.
I am not a talent evaluator, but, have always wondered how NBA scouts/mgt "project" players. Tatum is for real now, but, to me, his college and rookie games weren't amazing.
Each player, I suppose, has their "arc."
He looked quite good against an OK Hawks team. These Hawks played very hard on defense in the fourth. I was impressed.
Romeo is smooth. His motions, of all types, are fluid and seemingly in the correct direction for the play. His defensive movements look good and he doesn't get beat that much....for a guy who hasn't played at all in the NBA. He can jump and is accurate when he does.
His hands don't seem laser beam fast, but, he doesn't waste movements anyways. He doesn't get "excited" and he doesn't "droop". (take note Javonte Green). Body language is part of the game.
On offense his moves to the rim are potentially extraordinary. He has gotten clocked underneath a couple of times, but, I bet he figures it out. Like his movements in general, his shots are right and his form looks right. Last night he got to shoot some and did well with it.
If you watch the handful of baskets he has, he uses the glass and his hands are soft. No tomahawk activity here for the moment.
All of this talk about Romeo and Grant say one thing. Stevens does not give young players a chance and it hurts their development.
With Theis, Hayward, Brown and half of the Celtic's dancers on the bench with injuries?
Grant + Romeo = 56 minutes - 8 for 16 -- 23 points -- 4 blocks -- 3 for 5 from 3pt
Take that, Brad.